Memoranda for Submission to the Chief Ministers of the Two Telugu States.

Articles

A Poser to Samaikyandhra Leaders

 Dt:  22/1/14

A Poser to Samaikyandhra Leaders

 

Dr T.H.Chowdary*

 

It is  astonishing that  various leaders of  Samaikyandhra movements are  not seeing the writing on the wall, namely, the inevitability of the  division of A.P and  formation of the  Telengana  State.  The Congress party  in 1940s went blind to the  imminent and inevitable  partition of the  country and there by invited horrible communal riots and large scale uprooting of people from  their homes and  hearts. If the Samaikya  leaders really believe in the  unity and brotherhood of the  Telugu speaking people  and sincerely believe that the division will be harmful even to  Telengana then, instead of  holding rallies, strikes, bandhs shut downs and  so on  in Seemandhra and inciting the Seemandhra people,  they should  tour the  Telengana  districts and  explain to their brother Telugu speaking peoples  there the advantages  of preserving  the  state as it is.   Why don’t Samaikya leaders, who invoke the  principle of  “linguistic states”,  demand  to the  merger of  Yanam, Krishnagiri, Kolar and  Berhampur in A.P?

 

2. Whom are the Samaikyandhra  strikes and  bandhs  for weeks on end hurting ? Power is shut down in Seemandhra but is available in Telengana during these strikes. The industries and businesses in Seemandhra closed down.  Whose is the loss?  Schools  and colleges   are shut down.  Which students  will suffer? Everything is normal in Telengana and   Hyderabad. The  hurt and loss because of the  Samaikyandhra  movement  are in that  area and  for those  people.

 

3. Instead of inflicting pain upon themselves and inflaming the people against  Telengana leaders,  Samaikya leaders ought to spell out  the assistance  and  assurances    that the  Union Government  and the Telengana  leaders and parties  should  give  to the    Seemandhra  state to be.

 

4. Also, in view of the  incipient   desire and fledgling movement  for a separate  Rayalaseema state, the leaders of coastal andhra and Rayalaseeema should sit together and  decide whether they want to be in one  state and  what adjustments and understandings 

 

 

should be there in regard to  the location of various offices and institutions and  industreis.   If there is no agreement between the leaders of costal  area  on the one side and leaders of Rayalaseema on the other, would  it not  be   better that the Union government  instead of  bifurcation,  should propose trifurcation of the  state?

 

5. Is two or three-state division the only solution to the  differing  aspirations of the  Telugu  people?  Not necessarily.  Successive  governments of A.P blundered by undertaking all development in one city, Hyderabad. Should Telengana  continue that  blunder?  Can Hyderabad Metropolitan Development area be another state with a population of about one crore, more than that of  J&K, Himachal, Uttaranchal, Sikkim, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Manipur, Tripura, Goa and Puducheri?  Can Warangal, the  famous  Kakatiya empire’s  capital, be once  again the  capital of  Telengaa, so that  Telengana  would have  two major  developed  metropolises?  Coastal Andhra   will have  Visakhapatnam and  Rayalaseema  will have  Tirupati as  emerging  modern metros.

 

6. It is widely known that the main concern of the  Seemandhra  leaders is the status of Hyderabad  and  the prospects of the  Seemandhra  people and their  businesses  in and around Hyderabad.    Instead of  plainly telling the truth, why should they agitate for the continuance  of Samaikyandhra, which  like united India ( without  partition and Pakistan ) was impossible?  The stubborn  will and  violent actions of  Muslims all over India   ensured the partition of the  country.  The will for  a separate Telengana and the movement for it which  has been surfacing  now and then but suppressed in a short time earlier, have been   continuously gaining strength since the  year 2000  when the TRS was launched just like the demand for   Pakistan gained irresistible force among   Muslims after the    Pakistan resolution  of 1940.  The leaders of the  Samaikyandhra movement would do well to read the history of  India   from  the Khilafat movement of 1919-21 onwards till the murderous partition of the country and the irreconcilable  hostility between India and Pakistan thereafter. 

 

George Santayana  the great historian, philosopher said,  “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”.

 

7. It appears unlikely that A.P would be  restructured  before the General Elections, 2014.  The interval can  therefore  be utilised to deliberate  upon the  issues raised here and  decisions taken  democratically with  least dissatisfaction to many.

 

  (700 words)

END