Memoranda for Submission to the Chief Ministers of the Two Telugu States.

Articles

Waqfs: Islamic Imperialisms Residues in Swatantra Bharat

Dt:  5/11/24

Waqfs: Islamic Imperialisms Residues in Swatantra Bharat

Dr T H Chowdary*

 

Waqfs are the properties  dedicated by Muslims to  Allah the God of  Islam . The income that  comes out of those properties  is  exclusively used for the  welfare of Muslims . Bharat has the largest number of waqfs  -   4.9 lakhs registered  with more than 6 lakh acres with an annual income of Rs. 164 cr and valued at more than Rs. 1,50,000 cr  .

 

2.  The first waqf in  ( undivided) India was created  in 1192 AD  by  Md. Ghori. He conquered   the area  in North India  around Delhi defeating and killing  Prudhvi Raj Chauhan. On the  way back   to Afghanistan,  two villages  near  Moolasthan,  renamed as  Multan  by the Muslim conqueror  were created as  waqf  by  Md Ghori.  Later on as more and more areas of Bharat fell under Islamic rule, the invader -conqueror-  rulers and  the  Hindus converted as Muslims  had been  creating waqfs out of the  lands  falling under their  rule and grabbed by Muslims . They are  therefore    Islamic imperialism  residues in independent India .  This fact is of utmost importance: These are properties of Hindus   acquired by force by  Muslims  and dedicated  to Allah . The  income from them is  used solely for the  welfare of Muslims according to Sharia Law. Independent India  had done away with  Maharajas and Nawabs and taken over most of the properties and wealth . India has abolished  Zamindars and had  taken over their  properties . India  has  taken over the Eenams that Bharatiya  rulers   had bestowed upon a class of intellectuals serving the nation.

 

3.  They are  administered by Mutawallies .  The Islamists in India  and politicians appeasing them  for their votes in  the  name of  secularism and minority welfare assert that since the waqfs are   their God Allah’s property, the GOI  cannot  claim them, cannot acquire them  and  that they should  be administered solely by Muslims  and for their benefit only.   This assertion cannot  and should not be countenanced by the people of India , especially Hindus.

 

4. In the  year 1750,  Marthanda  Verma, the ruler of Travancore  state  dedicated  his entire  State  to  Padmanabha,  that is, Vishnu  one of the  Trinity that  Hindus  hold as  divine  ( Brahma, Vishnu and Maheswara).   In 1947 when India  gained  independence from the British rule,  God Padmanabha’s property , the Travancore State was  taken over and merged with the rest of  Bharat.  If a Hindu God’s property  can be taken over  by the State, why cannot  the Muslims’ god Allah’s property be  exempt from  being taken over  and merged    with the  rest of  Bharat? The secular state cannot  be partial and subservient to the god  of a particular religion.

 

5. According to our Constitution,  Bharat is a secular state. Government  should not  promote any religion and   exclude  other religions from promotion by the State. On 31-12-2013 the government  of India by the  United  Progressive Alliance (UPA) and Prime Minister  Manmohan Singh  directed and controlled  by Sonia Maino Gandhi at the head of National Advisory Council  consisting of  selected  persons by her created the  National Waqf  Development Corporation (NWDC) with an initial capital of Rs. 375 cr , later raised to  Rs.875 cr . Is it not preposterous and unabashedly communal   that  a secular government creates a corporation with government money for the  exclusive  benefit  of  Muslims  and that too without  any such corporation created for Hinds  or Sikhs or Parsis or Jains or  Buddhists.  The corporation’s aim is to develop and raise funds  for  Muslims  welfare.  It is astounding  why   the NDA government   since 2014 has not  nationalized   this corporation    and used its funds  and properties for the welfare  of   all citizens of this country irrespective of  their  religion.

 

6. Until the year 2006 the GOI had no Ministry of Minority Affairs . During the period 2004-14 the Sonia  directed UPA was ruling India    from  Delhi . In 2006 the UPA government created the Ministry of Minority Affairs.  The notorious  Abdul Rahaman Antulay  accused of  immense corruption when he was the Chef Minister of Maharashtra  was the first cabinet rank  Minister  heading this ministry .  Since then that  ministry had been  headed only by Muslims  until the NDA government  first put  Smriti Irani  (Parsi) of BJP  as the  Ministry for  Minority Affairs.  She was succeeded by  Kiren Rijiju,  a Buddhist.  During 7-8 June , 2012  the UPA government held a National Conference of the  Ministers for Minority Welfare  from all the  States of India. There  the Prime Minister  Manmohan Singh  listed  twenty schemes and the huge amounts that were spent  with hardly any concern for Christians  or Jains or  Buddhists or Sikhs.  The National Commission for Minorities  was set up in 1992 by the  Congress government. It was also  headed by  Muslims until the NDA came and put  a Parsi and  a Sikh  and a  Buddhist as its  head. These latter are  real minorities each with less than 2% while the Muslims are   variously  mentioned as between 15-20% of India’s population.

 

7. The Waqf 1995 Act is notorious for placing  the Waqf  Boards in the States   and  Waqf Council at the all India level above the Constitution of India.  Both are  composed of and headed  and staffed  only by Muslims.  Any Waqf  Board can at any time may  claim  any property . It is for the afflicted person to prove that the  property is  his and  not of waqf. This is  clear  violation of  natural  justice.  The Waqf Board appoints a surveyor to go into the objections of the   person whose  property is claimed to be that of the waqf. The expenditure on the  surveyor and the surveying  is  borne by the  GOI or by the state and  not by the  Waqf Board itself !  This is one more tax on non-Muslims of  India.  The  appeal of the affected  person or body is to the Waqf Tribunal consisting only of Muslims . The  verdict of the  Waqf Tribunal cannot be challenged in any Court of the Republic of India.   That means , Muslims through Waqf Boards and the Waqf Council  are  superior  to the  judicial system  in Bharat. They are  above law, a  law unto themselves.

 

8. The members  of the  Waqf  Boards and  the  Waqf Council and Tribunal are   appointed by the  secular government  on the advice  of these   Boards  themselves.  There is no time limit for any Waqf  Board to claim  any property anywhere as its  in the country as its own. The  Waqf Board in Tamilnadu has claimed a 1500 old temple site and property  as its   own. There was no Islam 1500 years ago anywhere in the world.  Recently  two villages near Patna in Bihar had been  claimed by the Waqf Borad of that state. Further,  most outrageously the site  on which the Allahabad  High Court is located is recently claimed by the  UP Waqf Board as its own. The poor Allahabad High Court has  appealed to the Supreme Court to save it from being acquired by the Waqf Board !   In Telangana  recently in Malkajgiri district  two villages are claimed  by the Waqf Board as its property .  Whenever it wants any property the Waqf Broad can  claim .  The affected person is at the  mercy of the   Waqf  Board   and the Waqf Tribunal.

 

9. The properties  already in its  possession and  for which it is and will be laying claim  are all those of Hindus’  conquered and acquired over time by the  Waqf Boards .  These are the residues  of Islamist imperialism.   Independent and  free Bharat has done away with   imperial Portuguese possession  of Goa  by armed action on  17 Dec 1961.  That necessitated an armed action  just as  the Nizam  had to be  brough to  heel by military action, Sept 17, 1948.  The Nizam’s rule was also  an Islamist imperial  rule . The French also had the territories in Chandan Nagar  in West Bengal and Pondicherry in Tamilnadu. The French  had  sense; they voluntarily  surrendered those territories in 1954 and 1963 respectively   .

 

10. The amendments proposed  now to the Waqf Act of 1995 should be passed only as an interim measure.  In the light of the  facts mentioned in this  narrative government should proceed to nationalize all the Waqf properties soonest through another law.  More than  five hundred princely states including Travancore which was that of   Lord Padmanabha had all been  brought under the state  of Bharat.  So should  these Waqf,  the  residues of Islamic  imperialism. (1,393 words)

END