Memoranda for Submission to the Chief Ministers of the Two Telugu States.

Book Review

“Nehru: A Troubled Legacy” by Sri RNP Singh

Dt:  27/7/15

Book Review

 

“Nehru: A Troubled Legacy”

by Sri RNP Singh

                                                                                         

Published by Wisdom Tree

4779/23 Ansari Road, Darya Ganj

New Delhi -110002; T: (11) 2324-7966

wisdomtreebooks@gmail.com

Price: Rs. 695 ; Pages: 337

 

Review by

 

Dr T.H.Chowdary

 

 

At the  20th Congress of the  CPSUB (Communist  Party of the Soviet Union) Nikita Khruschev, Secretary General of the party and USSR’s  supremo addressed a closed door meeting of the  party in 1956?  He narrated the gruesome tale of Stalin’s murders of thousands of noted communist party leaders  and members and   a few million  soviet  citizens .  This narration was heard in silence with grim faces.  During the  course of this  narration  one person shouted, “what were you doing then?”  “Who is that ? asked Khruschev. There was  absolute  silence.  Khrushchev repeated the  question  several times Nobody answered, nobody  looked up. Then Khruschev triumphantly  declared, “ I was as silent  and as frightened as the questioner is now”.

 

3. I am recounting this story because  now that   no Dynast  of Nehru is in power ,  a number of  former senior officers  and intellectuals are   boldly  narrating   the megalomaniac,  selfish,   dictatorial, dynasty –building,  power-hungry  and self-righteous  deeds and politics of  Pt.Jawaharlal Nehru. 

 

4. This  former  IB Officer Sri RNP Singh  in his long and detailed  story of  Nehru’s deeds  with  135 pages of Annexures   has exposed Nehru’s hitherto untold misdeeds  like Kashmir, India-China border and  Muslim minority which are severely troubling the nation  and seem to be un- resolvable.  Nehru considered himself an English man measuring upto Macaulay’s  idea of   English educated Indians  who are  only in blood and colour Indian but in tastes,  views, likes and  preferences English -men. Indeed, Nehru told John Kenneth Galbraith, US ambassador that he (Nehru) was the last Englishman to rule India.  Galbrith  was stunned at this self-description of  Nehru.  Gandhiji said, “Nehru is the  only Englishman  in my camp”. 

 

5. Nehru was inducted  as President of Congress at age 40, in 1929 at the wish of his father  and the fathers’ request to Mahatma Gandhi who   thrice  advised Sardar Patel the choice of Congress men as President,  to withdrew in Nehru’s favour.

 

6. Nehru talked of socialism in order to enthuse  the young but he never said what it meant  nor ever defined  socialism  when  challenged to do so by Subhash Chandra Bose and  Jaya Prakash  Narayan and  other Congress socialists.

 

7. Nehru had scant  respect for his   cabinet  colleague including Sardar Patel and  Rajendra Prasad. But  he had  fear of  Sardar Patel  behind whom the Congress party ever stood as  evidenced by the election  of Rajendra Prasad as the President of India, Purushottam Das Tandon as the President of Congress,  both against  the will and intervention of  Jawaharlal Nehru  personally.  He had to  submit to   Sardar Patel  in regard to   the Police Action against the recalcitrant Nizam of Hyderabad.  He listened to  the Englishman, Mountbatten and his wife, Edwina  in regard to Kashmir and not to his  colleagues including Sardar Patel.

 

8. Sri Singh tells in great  detail how  Nehru groomed his daughter  Indira Gandhi first  for presidentship of the  Congress and eventually for the Prime Ministership;  how he shielded corrupt people like Krishna Menon (of  Jeep  sandal)  and T.T. Krishnamachari  (of Mundhra rip off of the   Life Insurance Corporation’s funds). Nehru could  even tell lies  as  in his letter to  Rajendra Prasad telling him that Sardar Patel  agreed with Nehru  that Rajaji was to be the first President ( for telling this lie he  had later apologised).  Nehru was communal  in the sense that he advanced the  interests of Muslims  as against any Hindu  loyalist of his or Hindus in grneral. For example: he invited  Muslim League members to join the Congress and fraternised with them so that   they would  support him  against Sardar Patel & Rajendra Prasad; he entered into electoral alliance with the Muslim League which he earlier  bitterly criticised as utterly communal and  antinational; in Kerala in the 1952 General Elections just to win ; he put up  Hafiz Mohammed Ibrahim, the former  Muslim Leaguer against    his former college and  Congress President  J B Kripalani in a bye- election in Amroha (UP) where Muslims constituted 37% of the electorate.

 

9. Nehru  had scant regard for military officers; he showed favouritism   to  a Kashmiri Pandit, General  B.M.Kaul . He had unjustified faith that communist China would never  wage any war on India.  He withheld the  fact of Chinese  occupation of  40,000 sq.kmts Aksai Chin  area of Laddkah for more than  two years from the Parliament.  His arrogant and  unrealisable assertion that he has  ordered the Indian  army to throw out the Chinese, fully knowing that the Indian  armed  forces were no match to the Chinese in any  sector  provoked the Chinese to attack India.

 

10. He asked Rajendra Prasad, the President not to  consecrate Lord  Shiva’s idol in Somnath (Rajendra Prasad defied in this regard). Nehru ordered his Cabinet  colleagues and the President  not to  go to the  funeral of  Sardar Patel when he died in Bombay in 1950; Nehru once again ordered his Cabinet colleagues not to  go to the funeral of Dr Rajendra Prasad, the first President of India; (Dr.Radhakrishnan  disobeyed Nehru  and went to  Rajendra Prasad’s funeral) .  Nehru had  aversion  to have  Rajendra Prasad’s cremation and  a memorial on the  banks of Jamuna along side of  Gandhiji (and others later). 

 

11. Nehru preferred foreign experts’ opinions and disregarded  India’s own intellectuals.  Nehru’s was total discomfited  at the  humiliating  defeat that Chinese  inflicted on India  with not a single leader of the more than  70  non –aligned countries he thought he was leading , spoke in India’s behalf.

 

12. The Appendices running to 129 pages  and   the hundreds  of references that the author has given, fully authenticate what Sri Singh had to  say about  this  bombastic, double -speak, double standard, Mecaulayan Indian owing his  position entirely due to  his father and to Gandhiji. The Nehru family persons, Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi,  Sonia Gandhi   and Rahul Gandhi are all of the same   feather , totally selfish, little educated and  who have  neglected  of nation-building and concentrated on Dynasty building  and who subordinated India’s and Hindus’  interests  to those of  Muslims.  That Nehru  was appeasing  Muslims and had no sensitivity to Hindu sentiments is tellingly brought out by the narration  of Nehru’s opposition to have the Common Civil Code while  reforming the  Hindu laws about heritage,  marriage and so on. The Nehru Dynasty and the Congress are anti-Hindu party of minorities, i.e , Muslims during Nehru’s time and  Muslims and  Christians now . It is as well  that Narendra Modi  talks of “Congress mukt Bharat” that is,  an India rid of the Congress party which has been totally sullied by and subordinated to the minorities.  It has become proprietary and has degenerated to be a party  for  minorities  for their vote banks against the  majority  Hindus .

 

Why is it that with all the  will in the world, I cannot understand what is obvious to you ? I am not as far as I know, suffering from intellectual decay.  Should you not then set your heart on at least making me understand what you are after.  – Mahatma Gandhi to Nehru

 

“ You are in the habit of  proclaiming  that you stand by yourself and represent nobody else. At the same time you call yourself a socialist– some times , a full blooded  socialist. How   a socialist can be an individualist  as you regard yourself beats me. The one is  anti-thesis of the other   - Subhas Chandra Bose to Nehru

 

(These questions  were never answered by the  great  Jawaharlal  Nehru –Reviewer)

 

 

END