Memoranda for Submission to the Chief Ministers of the Two Telugu States.

Articles

Vodafone – Idea - Moratorium

 Dt:  8/1/26

Vodafone – Idea  - Moratorium

Dr T. H. Chowdary*

 

“Take my stake and save Vodafone-Idea” , wrote Sri Kumara Mangalam Birla, the eminent Indian promotor of  Vodafone-Idea   to the Cabinet Secretary of the GOI  on June 7, 2021. Subsequently on Aug 2, 2021  he resigned as Chairman and Managing Director of the  company too.  What else could he do or  anyone else do  in the plight of the company on the brink of default for massive amounts due to  government by March 2, 2022 with cash balance of only a few hundred crores;  no bank or financial institution was willing to lend  and millions of subscribers shifting to rivals  mainly to RJio.

2. The DOT/ GOI  converted of what it was claiming as  dues in default ,  as equity  in the   company  in two installments -  Feb 2023 to 33.1% and April 2025 to 49%.  Thus holding  a little over 49% of the equity of Vodafone; now 2% more would qualify  the company  to be a state-owned enterprise  like the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd (MTNL )   since the decades long   loss-making, subscriber loosing ,  interest payment on debentures defaulting , govt Telco (G Telco). 

3. When the company was formed  by merger  of Vodafone and Idea   in Aug 2018, it had about 400 mln subscribers ( 35% of the  total cell phones in India ) ( Vodafone 21% and Idea 14%) . In Nov 2025 it has   128 mln ,  17.1%  of the  total cell phones in India -  half  of what it had  when  the merged company emerged . 

 

Debt Burden: Rs. 2.17 lakh cr

Subscribers: about 200 mln ; loosing > 2 mln per month

Current ( Jan 2026) Situation: ARPU  (Average revenue per use / month): Rs. 167 (RJio & AirTel >250; BSNL-164)

Recent Financial loss:

Loss / Qrtr ending

Sept 24

March 25

June 25

Sept 25

Crores

Rs. 7175

7166

6608

5524

 

Rs. 26,473 cr/yr

 

 

 

 

4.  No Telco in India has figured in newspapers and in the Supreme Court of India / DOT claiming dues and Vodafone Idea contesting as frequently as Vodafone Idea  .-----------The latest is truce; the government agreeing for a moratorium on Rs. 87,675 cr it has been claiming from Vodafone Idea and  Vodafone Idea has been contesting the Supreme Court ruling that th e GOI can take any ameliorative measures (like Vajpayi government emigrating all P-Telcos from up-front payment to revenue share).

5. The question arises whether the  Vodafone Idea with a public debt of over 2 lakh crore rupees, losing about 20 lakh subscribers a month and five thousand crores of rupees per quarter with least average revenue per month among the P-Telcos, can over the next 5 years of moratorium of stem losses of about Rs. 20,000 cr per year, make a profit of Rs. 87,695 cr to pay off the debt claimed by DOT government ! Government after the moratorium period of 5 years ( 2030) can decide to write off or modify the moratorium !

6. I have been holding and still hold that the government is unethical and unreasonable and  anti-business on several counts.

·       Auctioning radio spectrum – Government  does not generate radio spectrum used for cell telephony. Telcos themselves generate the spectrum and  use it again and again by technology and  engineering.  How logical or ethical  it is  for government to sell  or auction what it does not produce and  own ? It can regulate its  use and charge the  cost of regulation, allocation and  enforcement.

·       Sunlight and  Wind are used to produce electricity.  They are  not auctioned by government.

·       After selling spectrum, the buyer Telco is charged for using it ( like a house is sold; but its use for living is charged) – called spectrum usage charge.

·       The spectrum is inexhaustible; it can be generated and  used again and again.

·       The largest and the  smallest country have the  same equal  , inexhaustible radio spectrum.

·       When the Telcos make profits, they pay income tax ; why at all they should give  a share  of their  revenue to government. Government does not share their losses.

·       In view of above facts, the  Telcos are  treated unfairly

7. The P-Telcos RJio and Bharti AirTel exist and  operate under the same  conditions as Vodafone, BSNL and MTNL .   While the first two get decent revenues, gain subscribers and benefit share holders, MTNL, BSNL and Vodafone Idea  lose money and subscribers .   It is  characteristic of all businesses : some gain and prosper while some lose, wither and  wind up.  But government companies can have  eternal life as the  late Sri Vasant Sathe, Communications Minister observed:

Public sector Undertakings

 

Academicians have attributed several traditional strengths to the public sector .

They primarily are:

 

-ability to survive without profit

-state-ownership gives them immortality

-wages and high bonuses can be paid ever by continuously incurring losses

-government  ownership gives full benefit of a monopoly

                                                                                -Vasant Sathe,  in the book

Restructuring of Public Sector in India

 

But cannot Sri Modi-led government be more prudent .

8. Can it not take over Vodafone-Idea; merge the lotus-eating loss-making MTNL, BSNL and Vodafone-Idea; direct the maha-merged company to pool resources, and losses say within three years and if not wind it up.  Duopoly of RJio and  AirTel, well-regulated cannot be harmful . USA and UK have duopoly in political parties, have duopoly in over 80% of telecom markets and numerous small telcos in the  rest niche telecom services. (872 words)

END