Memoranda for Submission to the Chief Ministers of the Two Telugu States.

Articles

Can Corruption be Eliminated?

 Dt:  18/2/14

Can Corruption be Eliminated?

 

Dr T.H.Chowdary*

 

There is not one  political party or leader not denouncing corruption; even Sonia  Gandhi and  Lalloo Prasad have also expressed to zero tolerance to corruption. Parliament’s committees, laws, inquiry commissions, court cases have been galore  to eliminate  corruption.  Yet nothing has   been thriving  in this land, as corruption. The reason is, it simply is natural  and as  eternal  as noise and poverty. The amount and  extent  can vary with  time and social  and governmental morality.  Power corrupts and absolute  power corrupts and criminalises.  Pitirim Sorokin, a Russian  intellectual researched power of kings, presidents, Prime Ministers, dictators and  demagogues spanning about  thousand  years ( Power and Morality- Bharatiya  Vidya  Bhavan) and showed that  criminality and  corruption and  immorality were in direct proportion to the  power one had. Governments have the utmost power especially those  professing  socialism, communism, poverty elimination, empowerment and inclusiveness of  aam admi.  Legislatures  are turned into law   factories; government offices become  rule makers. The clever helped by accountants, tax consultants, lawyers, MLAs and MPs, public relations women, “paid news” papers and journalists  –for-hire “milk” the public exchequer (?).  Rajaji, Munshi, Ranga and Masani, eminent patriots  and politicians floated the  Swatantra Party in the  nineteen sixtees.  Its main philosophy was “least government”   for ministers  and government  officers wielding  power, are the  originators and beneficiaries of  corruption.  Unfortunately Swatanra  flamed in a few states  and  expired  too soon.

 

2.   The Nehru-Gandhi rule has been becoming  “socialistic” and garib-friendly ( in discourse).  To capture power, parties have to choose “winning” candidates.  Winnability has been increasingly dependent on “spendability”.  A prominent MP of A.P several times frankly pronounced in public that he was spending every time about Rs. 30 cr to win and  the  expense is going up.  Every candidate for election from Panchayat  to Parliament is

 

 

distributing cash to every voter/group of  voters.  The latter accept from all candidates to please them but vote according to  their  own  pleasure.  All this amount  is “black” money.  In addition to this  cash distribution, parties and  candidates  spend huge  money on public meetings, rallies, posters, processions  and transportation of  voters to rallies and polling booths. The winners have to earn several times  they spend an d that is  through  corruption .

 

3.  Unabashed Corruption:  The  Steel Minister  in the UPA-II government held a Consultative Meeting in Lucknow (!) on 03-02-2014 to augment country’s steel output.  1000 person  drawn from dalits, BCs and  minorities were invited and were given cell phones, cash and  other  gifts for the  advice they gave to boost steel production to 300 mln tons P.A by Y 2025!  The Minister told  the  Rajya Sabha that next year he would invite  2000 persons – all from his constituency.  If squandering government money in this  manner is not corruption, what is  corruption?  If in disgust, the  rich  avoid or evade taxes, will that be corrupt and criminal or amoral?

 

4.  A large amount of  election related expenditure can be  saved and so the need to corrupt gains, by use of information technology in the  following  way:

 

·         All canvassing for votes by candidates  and parties should be over TV channels. There are  over 800 of them spread over all languages. All channels  as a  condition of licence, maybe required  to allot specific  time-slots, every day, from the  date nominations are accepted (after scrutiny) upto the  date  of election. Candidates and parties may talk on these  channels and take  question  from viewers on toll-free  telephone lines ( so that they need not pay; but the election commission or the  government pays  the  telephone  companies). Amount of  time  allotted  may be  related to the estimated party’s strength/popularity. Public meetings should be  permissible only in auditoria, marriage  halls only.

 

5. Voting may be  electronic; over the  Internet from voter’s own smart phone or Internet booths, which will be existing, like public  telephones, in all villages and  several locations in urban areas.  The voter  stands before  the  EVM and looks into the  camera.  He keys his  identity  number, the EVM compares the  identity; if ok,  a light comes ‘go ahead’.  He/she presses the button assigned to his  candidate. Vote is registered and a proper receipt is  printed  from which he can  ascertain correct registration . All the  EVMs in the   constituency are linked/networked. The result can be  flashed at all the   ballot-booths with details of  who polled how  many votes. 

 

The I.T based elections  will reduce the  need for corruption.  But corruption resorted to because of greed to accumulate money, wealth would remain. This  can be  reduced only by the highest in the  society are moral. If for example the  ruler  of this  country, Sonia Gandhi and her family members ( Wadra included) put details of their wealth and  income tax returns  on a public website and  challenge  all ministers,  MPs/MLAs and government secretaries  to do like-wise, a beginning will be  made to largely reduce  corruption.

 

6.  Noise, poverty and  corruption can never be eliminated; they can be  reduced but that is  possible  only if the  rulers are not  corrupt themselves. The less the government  involvement in business, the  less the  need for permits, licences and quotas, the  less will be  corruption.  (854 words)

 

END