Dt: 22/6/21
National Population Policy
-Dr T.H.Chowdary*
It is fashionable among some politicians and even columnists to gloat over demographic dividend that India has in having a huge young population below age 25 and so we can become a several trillion dollar economy and great power like the USA and China. The real issue is whether these hundreds of millions of young people are so many mouths to be fed, clothed, housed, educated, employed and health- cared to create wealth for the country or just counted as voters to be wooed by contending political parties espousing and promising numerous welfare programs by distribution of precious tax and debt monies so that people are fed to breed ever more poor voters. The problem of population and a country’s economic wellbeing was addressed as long ago as in the 18th century by Thomas Robert Malthus ( b. 1766, d.1834) . He published in 1798 the famous , “An Essay on the Principle of Population” wherein he analyzed population growth related to the economy. His essay raised considerable interest in Europe among economists and politicians . The only country in current times which took notice of Malthus essay in earnestness is the Peoples Republic of China. Malthus argued that people multiply fast when their food needs are taken care of and that since there is a limit on the capacity of earth to yield sufficient food grains, a continuous growth of population without limit cannot be sustained. By political programs, the poor can be maintained in painless poverty . But that requires huge expenditure of the nation’s finances. For eg: in our country, more than 80 cr people are helped to sustain life through near- free supply of food grains and related items through Public Distribution System (PDS). They are also helped to get money through the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) according to which the poor are paid some
minimum wages for a number of days in a year to mitigate their poverty. The work that they do is not to create any permanent asserts, not even for the maintenance of the assets but just to get them wages for some little work they have done . India hopes to become a 5 trln dollar economy in the near future but by that time, the population might exceed 1400 mlns, overtaking even China’s. The per capita income (PCI) may not see any worth while increase in terms of purchasing capacity.
2. There has been furious growth of population in the world as well as in India mostly arising out of food security . (see tables below)
World’s Population and the Poor
Year |
Population |
% of the Poor |
1820 |
1.1 bln |
85% |
1980 |
5 bln |
30% |
2000 |
6 bln |
20% |
2015 |
7.0 bln |
15% |
India’s Population Growth
Yr |
1951 |
61 |
71 |
81 |
91 |
2001 |
2011 |
Pop (mln) |
361.1 |
439.2 |
548.2 |
683.3 |
846.3 |
1028.7 |
1210.1 |
Decadal growth (%) |
13.3 |
21.6 |
24.8 |
24.7 |
23.5 |
21.5 |
|
Decadal increase (mln) |
42.4 |
78.1 |
108.9 |
135.6 |
162.9 |
182.4 |
· The Muslim population of India in 1951 was 9.8%. Today it is between 16 -20%, the latter figure if the infiltrators from Bangladesh and Rohingyas of Myanmar are included
· The SC proportion in India has increased from 15 -22% and that of STs from 7.5% to 12%.
· Political parties are competing for their vote by appeasement and also by providing kanukalu that is, gifts like pasupu kumkamulu by Chandra Babu Naidu Bathukamma cheeralu by Sri K Chandrasekhara Rao and so on.
3. In India the population growth is not among the well- to- do but among the ill to do. The population of the poor ( SCs, STs, Muslims and some other sections ) has furiously increased while the proportion of the so called forward castes has dwindled to about 10-12%. The calories of intake per person per day to keep him in good health is about 2500. We have not yet reached that figure in India. While countries like South Korea and Malaysia and Indonesia which got freedom and self-rule later than India have literacy of over 90% in India it is about 65% (up from below 20% in 1947) . Since the 1980s we had become self-sufficient in food grains and related products . We have been adding 15-18 mln people per year. Never we have created that many jobs in any year. For long, we talked about uneducated, unemployed persons. Then we had educated, un-skilled and unemployed persons. After that, we skilled the educated and now we are having educated, skilled, unemployed persons. From a development state, our governments have “progressed” towards welfare states and now to charity states where besides little tax revenues huge borrowed amounts are spent for welfare of the poor -food security, employment guarantee, free housing, distribution of state monies as marriage gifts and festival entertainment and many free services like free travel for women in city busses and trains …. ( 700 items are decided to be given free by the DMK party in Madras State and these are being progressively implemented). Governments are taking loans to be repaid after 30 years by which time the present Chief Minister nor his son (the prospective Chief Minister) would be alive, leaving the debt burden to the next generations.
· When Sri Chandra Bab Naidu was the Chief Minister of undivided AP (1995-2004) , I submitted to him three manthras
· One, Two, Three if you have one child, government will take care; if you have two children, you will take care; if you have three- children god only may take care
· Feed and Breed must stop. That is, government distributing charity to the poor and they producing many children must stop.
· Learn and Earn: Everyone should go to school and make himself fit to earn money by the sweat of his labour
Sri Chandra Babu Naidu popularized these ideas and by 2004 the growth rate of population in AP came down from 2.8% to 1.8%.
4. The country which obviously has benefited from the Malthus Essay is China. In the late -1970s itself, after Mao Tse Tung’s death under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping the country adopted the one-child norm. Until 1992 the per capita income (PCI) in China was less than that in India and its economic prosperity and its industrial might was also inferior to that of India. But the one- child norm enabled the country to increase its wealth enormously to become a super power and the second largest economy of $ 15 trln in the world. In order to sustain this power and prosperity, in the year 2006 China decided that each family should have two children . And in the year 2021 it has decided with the objective of surpassing the US in annual GDP, it is wanting its families to have three children. It is clear that China is having a National Population Policy which is changing to be in tune with its economic prosperity and continuous growth so that China would be on top of the world.
5. Unfortunately, India has not had a national policy just like our National Education Policy (NEP) and National Telecom Policy (NTP) and for other sectors like energy etc. During the Indira Gandhi’s Emergency rule 1975-77, her young son, Sanjay Gandhi was alarmed by this population growth, especially among those who can’t afford large families and therefore are doomed to perpetual poverty. He took to coercive measures to sterilize men . It spelt doom for Indira Gandhi’s Congress party in the year 1977 post – Emergency elections . Since then, no politician or political party or even any intellectual is daring to talk of population growth publicly but in private many express horror at growth of the population among welfare consuming sections of our people. While Chia could implement whatever policy it adopted because it is a dictatorship and not a multi- party democracy like ours, with periodic elections, it is difficult to make any law to force families to have only one or two children. In fact, Maulana Badruddin Ajmal of All India United Democratic Front, a Muslim party in Assam has proudly and challengingly declared that no law in India can enforce a limit on the number of children that a Muslim family can have. Maybe, leaders of other sections of beneficiaries of state charity may not agree to make any law .
6. The way forward: The only way is to have disincentives against large families. These could be:
· Every measure of welfare whether preferential employment or poverty relief will be applicable to families having only one child. The moment a second child comes, these welfare measure will be withdrawn from that family. The state has resources to sustain only one- child families and their development.
· Preferential employment, that is reservations for admission to educational institutions and to government offices will be only for one- child and that too for one generation in a family.
· Parents who produce a second child will not be eligible for any elective post in panchayat, Mandal or district or Zilla Parishad or State Legislature and Parliament of India.
Before enforcing these disincentives, intellectuals and patriots, political leaders and parties must educate the public on the need for these drastic measures to control the run -away growth of population especially among the poor. It is unwise to keep millions of people in painless poverty as we are now doing; if we want to become a prosperous and powerful nation where every person has high income, good education and good health. We must have national population policies that are in accordance with our economy and our resolve to grow that economy and increase every body’s prosperity and longevity of healthy life. The nation’s population policy may be reviewed and revised ( like NTP-‘94, NTP-‘99; NEP-‘89, NEP-2020…..) in the light of objective conditions and nation’s aspirations.
(1569 words) END