Dt: 12/12/19
Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) –
Rant of “ Seculars”’, Left Liberals and Islamists
Dr T.H.Chowdary*
Politicians of the AIMIM and different communist parties and of course, the Congress and the appeasement queen of TMC are all faulting the BJP and its allies for not including Muslims in the list of persecuted people to be given citizenship of India. They are saying that the CAB is communal and divisive and discriminates against Muslims on the basis of religion. They forget that India was partitioned to create the Islamic state of Pakistan. The partition was supported vehemently by communists and was agreed to by the Congress even as it rejected the two-nation theory. It was the Muslims of India ( not of what constitutes Pakistan and Bangladesh) who vehemently asserted and rioted for the partition of this country. The Hindu-Sikh population of Pakistan has come down from 17% to 1.5%; the Hindu Buddhist population of Bangladesh has come down from 30% to less than 7% and is still declining. The decline in the Hindu- Sikh- Buddhist population is entirely due to oppression of the non- Muslim minorities. Where else can Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists and Jains seek safety excepting in their millennial mother land, Hindu India ? There are fifty seven Islamic states in the world and Muslims belong to the border- less brother hood , umma any Muslim persecuted anywhere in the world can seek shelter in any one of the 57 member countries of the Organisation of Islamic Co-operation (OIC) .
2. There are more than 100 Christian nation states . Any Christian tormented in a non-Christian state can seek refuge in any one of them. Why should Muslims and Christians come to India for shelter ? Even though our Constitution defines India as a secular state, in practice its
governments are appeasing and promoting Muslim and Christian interests from government funds. Politicians seeking votes and power have reduced secularism to the promotion of Muslims and Christians religious interests using state revenues . Both Islam and Christianity are engaged in conversion of Hindus. Neither of these from other countries should be given citizenship in India.
3. Is it not intriguing that Muslims fleeing from the Islamic State on the borders of Iraq and Syria sought refuge not in any Muslim country but only in Christian Europe? What message does it convey –Muslimisation of non –Muslims countries ?
4. The illegal entry of Rohingyas (Muslims of Bangladeshi origin who colonised certain areas of Myanmar ) into India and their settlement in areas inhabited mainly by Muslims (old city of Hyderabad, Delhi and as far as in Jammu and not in the Muslim majority Kashmir Valley ) is particularly menacing to the security of the country and its demography . Why should they not have entered Bangladesh, the 93% Muslim country from where they had spilled over into bordering Myanmar ? Why should they come to India and why should they be sheltered and succoured by Muslims of this country? Malaysia, the Muslim country hunted and shunted them out. The Rohingyas that are sheltered by their co-religionists in India are contracting marriages with Indian Muslim citizens; children are born to them Rohingyas are facilitated to get documents like Aadhar and certificates from schools . Theses are adding to the tens of millions of Bangladeshi Muslims whose entry into India has been facilitated by the CPM and latter by the TMC in West Bengal for constituting them into vote banks. Delhi which in 1951 had 50,000 Muslims has now over 2,500,000 Muslims .Their numbers are decisive as to who would be elected as an MLA or an MP. Pakistan was created as the home -land for the Indian sub- continents’ Muslims. In the 1945-46 general elections to the provincial and Central Legislatures the separate Muslim electorates overwhelmingly voted for the Muslim League which demanded and rioted (Recall Direct Action in Calcutta on 16 Aug 1946 and thereafter) for the partition of India. But India’s Muslims who were responsible for the partition and the creation of the Islamic state of Pakistan did not go to the homeland they created but have largely stayed on in India and proliferated from 9.8% in 1951 to about 16% officially and perhaps much more if the infiltrators from Bangladesh and now Rohingyas are also included. India cannot afford to be overwhelmed by divisionists growing within and infiltrating from outside.
5. In extending citizenship to Christians from other countries the CAB is unjust to Hindus. Christians had not been friends with Hindus; on the other hand Christian missions are engaged in foul means to convert Hindus and the converted are dis-affected with India as a nation.
6. It ill behooves the Congress and Islamists and Communists to say that the BJP is divisive. Muslims were supported by communists in their demand for carving out Pakistan , holding Muslims as a separate nation entitled to self-determination (Stalin’s theory of Self Determination for nationalities). While Congress agreed to the division of India on the basis of religion, communists divided even a district, Malabar in Kerala to create Muslim -majority Mallapuram district and the “secular” Congress too divided Gurugaon district in Haryana and created the Muslim- majority district of Mewat . The Congress long ago created a separate development authority for the Muslim majority old city of Hyderabad (Quli Qutubshah Development Authority) .
7. The BJP and its allies would do well to reconsider the CAB and confer citizenship only to people of Indic religions persecuted in other countries. Hindus, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists can get refuge and citizenship in the only Hindu majority country Bharat. Once a Hindu state Nepal had gone “secular” under communist influence and is now the spring board for Islamist infiltrators into India. It is well to remember the sage words of Madame Annie Besant, founder of India’s Home Rule League and once President of the Indian National Congress.
India and Hinduism are one
“After a study of some forty years and more of the great religions of the world, I find none so perfect none so scientific none so philosophical and none so spiritual than the great religion known by the name of Hinduism.
“Make no mistake, without Hinduism, India has no future. Hinduism is the soil into which India’s roots are stuck and torn out of that she will inevitably wither as a tree torn out from its place. And if Hindus do not maintain Hinduism, who shall save it? If India’s own children do not cling to her faith, who shall guard it? India alone can save India and India and Hinduism are one”.
(Italians, infiltrators and angrezon our Arab and Mongol ke Aulaad won’t save Hinduism. Hindus and other Indic people alone can save India that is Bharat.
(1,110 words)
END