Memoranda for Submission to the Chief Ministers of the Two Telugu States.

Articles

Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) – Rant of “ Seculars”’, Left Liberals and Islamists

Dt:  12/12/19

Citizenship Amendment Bill  (CAB) –

Rant  of  “ Seculars”’, Left Liberals and Islamists

 

Dr T.H.Chowdary*

 

Politicians of the AIMIM and different communist parties and of course, the Congress and the  appeasement queen of TMC are all faulting  the  BJP and its allies  for not including Muslims in the list of persecuted  people to be given citizenship of  India. They are  saying that the CAB is communal and divisive and discriminates against Muslims on the basis of religion. They forget that India was partitioned to create the  Islamic state of Pakistan. The  partition was supported  vehemently by  communists and was agreed to  by the Congress  even as it rejected the  two-nation theory. It was the Muslims of India ( not of what constitutes Pakistan  and Bangladesh) who  vehemently asserted and rioted for the partition  of this country. The Hindu-Sikh population  of  Pakistan  has come  down from 17% to 1.5%;  the Hindu Buddhist population of Bangladesh  has come down from 30% to less than 7% and is still declining. The decline in the  Hindu- Sikh- Buddhist population is entirely due to oppression of the non- Muslim minorities. Where else can  Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists and Jains seek  safety excepting in their millennial   mother land,    Hindu India ? There are  fifty seven  Islamic states in the  world and Muslims  belong to the border- less brother hood , umma any Muslim persecuted anywhere in the world can seek shelter in any  one of the 57 member countries   of the Organisation of Islamic Co-operation (OIC) .

 

2. There are more than 100 Christian nation states . Any Christian tormented in a non-Christian  state can seek refuge in any one of  them. Why should  Muslims  and Christians  come to India for shelter ? Even though our Constitution defines India as  a  secular state, in practice its

governments are  appeasing and promoting  Muslim  and  Christian interests from government funds.  Politicians  seeking votes and power  have reduced  secularism to the promotion of Muslims and  Christians religious interests using state revenues . Both Islam and Christianity are engaged in conversion of Hindus.  Neither  of these from other countries should be given  citizenship in India.

 

3. Is it not  intriguing that Muslims fleeing from the Islamic State on the borders of Iraq and Syria  sought refuge not in any Muslim   country but only in Christian  Europe? What message  does it convey –Muslimisation of non –Muslims countries ?

 

4. The illegal entry of Rohingyas  (Muslims of Bangladeshi origin who colonised  certain areas of Myanmar ) into India and  their  settlement  in areas inhabited  mainly by Muslims (old city  of Hyderabad, Delhi and as far as in Jammu and not in the Muslim  majority Kashmir Valley ) is particularly menacing to the security  of the country and  its demography . Why should they not have  entered Bangladesh, the 93% Muslim  country from where they had spilled over into bordering Myanmar ? Why should they come to India and  why should they be sheltered and  succoured  by   Muslims of this  country?  Malaysia, the Muslim country hunted  and shunted them out.  The Rohingyas that are  sheltered by their  co-religionists in India are contracting marriages with Indian Muslim citizens; children are born to them Rohingyas are  facilitated to get documents like Aadhar and certificates from schools . Theses are adding to the  tens of millions of  Bangladeshi Muslims whose  entry into India has been facilitated by the CPM and latter by the  TMC in West Bengal for constituting them into vote banks.  Delhi   which in 1951 had  50,000 Muslims  has now over 2,500,000 Muslims .Their  numbers are  decisive as to who would be elected as an MLA or an MP. Pakistan  was created as the home -land for the Indian sub- continents’ Muslims. In the 1945-46 general elections to the provincial and  Central Legislatures the separate Muslim electorates overwhelmingly voted for the Muslim League which  demanded and rioted (Recall Direct Action in Calcutta on 16 Aug 1946 and thereafter) for the partition of India.   But India’s Muslims who were responsible for  the partition and the creation of the  Islamic state of Pakistan did not go to the homeland they created but have largely  stayed on in India and proliferated from 9.8%  in 1951 to about   16% officially and perhaps  much more if the infiltrators from Bangladesh  and now Rohingyas are also  included.  India cannot afford to be  overwhelmed  by divisionists  growing within and infiltrating from outside.

 

5. In extending citizenship to Christians from other countries the CAB is unjust to Hindus.  Christians had not been  friends   with Hindus;  on the other hand  Christian missions are engaged   in foul means  to convert Hindus and  the converted are dis-affected with India as a nation.

 

6. It ill behooves the Congress and  Islamists and  Communists to say that the BJP is divisive. Muslims were supported by communists in their demand for carving out Pakistan , holding Muslims as a separate nation entitled to self-determination (Stalin’s theory of Self Determination for nationalities). While Congress  agreed to the division of India on the  basis of religion,   communists   divided even a district,  Malabar in Kerala to create  Muslim -majority Mallapuram district   and the “secular” Congress too divided Gurugaon district in Haryana and created the  Muslim- majority district of Mewat . The Congress long ago created  a separate  development authority for  the Muslim   majority old city of Hyderabad  (Quli Qutubshah Development Authority) .

 

7.  The  BJP and its allies    would  do well to reconsider  the  CAB  and  confer   citizenship only   to people  of  Indic religions persecuted in other countries. Hindus, Sikhs,  Jains and Buddhists can get  refuge and citizenship  in the only Hindu majority  country Bharat.  Once a Hindu state Nepal had gone  “secular”  under communist influence and is now  the spring board for Islamist  infiltrators into India. It is well to remember the  sage words of Madame Annie Besant, founder of India’s Home Rule League and once  President of the Indian National Congress.

 

India and Hinduism are one

 

“After a study of some forty years and more of the great religions of the world, I find none so perfect none so scientific none so philosophical and none so spiritual than the great religion known by the name of Hinduism.

 

“Make no mistake, without Hinduism, India has no future.  Hinduism is the soil into which India’s roots are stuck and torn out of that she will inevitably wither as a tree torn out from its place.  And if Hindus do not maintain Hinduism, who shall save it? If India’s own children do not cling to her faith, who shall guard it? India alone can save India and India and Hinduism are one”.

 

(Italians, infiltrators and  angrezon our Arab and Mongol ke Aulaad won’t save Hinduism.  Hindus and other Indic people  alone can save India that is  Bharat.

(1,110 words)

END