Articles
Kancha Ilaiah and the 67 people are no eminent They are “eminent” among themselves by mutual appreciation and flattering .
Dt: 9/6/16
Kancha Ilaiah and the 67 people are no eminent
They are “eminent” among themselves by mutual appreciation
and flattering .
Dr T.H.Chowdary*
This is in response to “67 eminent personalities and academics from within India and outside” issuing a statement declaring their solidarity with Kancha Ilaiah against whom a “hate speech” case is registered .
2. I am a non-Brahmin. I come from a family whose illustrious elders, the late Sri Tripuraneni Ramaswamy Chowdary and Sri Tripuraneni Gopichand (in honour of both the Department of Posts of the Government of India brought out commemorative stamps) who critically analysed and commented about what has come to be known as Brahminism – in the Hindu society: castes, congenital inequality among them, untouchability and perpetual poverty inflicted on certain sections in Hindu society. But neither of them ever indulged in Brahmin -baiting and made incendiary hate speeches or denounced Hinduism. In fact, Sri Gopichand began as an atheist and anti-caste hegemony, then became a communist, a humanist and radical, humanist, and finally accepted Aurabindoist vision of Life Divine and superiority of Hindu Dharma over every other philosophy . I too started as an ardent communist but through study, observation and experience have, come to the conclusion that Marxism and the Abrahamic religions are inhuman and that Sanatan Dharma popularly called Hinduism is the only philosophy that can guarantee harmony and order among peoples and mutually dependent co-existence of man and nature, the continued existence of life on this planet and the cosmic order. Having said this, let me now comment about Sri Kancha Ilaiah and the “eminents” who have come in his support.
3. Sri Kancha Ilaiah had written a book, “Why I am not a Hindu” ( the philosopher, Nobel Laureate Bertrand Russell wrote the book, “ Why I am not a Christian”) . Then decency requires that he could go on giving expositions about the superiority of his philosophy and faith that he has converted to now and not indulge in offensive and obscene criticism of the Hindu dharma that he has renounced. How would Muslims or Christians like a Hindu denounce
Prophet Mohammed or Jesus Christ or their doings or their methods of expansion and even their frauds etc. Surely, scores of cases would be foisted against them. Indeed it is the large heartedness and legendary tolerance of Hindus that has so far not filed case against Kancha Ilaiah for his hate speeches, false-hoods. People must be aware that he is now engaged by the Maulana Azad National Urdu University where he heads a Center for the Study of Social Exclusion and Inclusive Policy, matter that has nothing to do with Urdu . Also he is not known to be a Urdu scholar. Also, Islam divides humanity into Muslims and Kafirs obligating the former to convert the latter.
4. Obviously, he is in league with all those who are congenitally anti-Hindu and are engaged in activities to disintegrate the Hindu society and promote conversion of Hindus to Christianity or Islam. It would be interesting if an investigation is made about his means of livelihood, his properties and his visits abroad and the connections he has with anti-Hindu evangelist organisations, NGOs and Islamist companions.
5. Almost all of the 67 Indian signatories who have come to the defence of Ilaiah are Marxists, those who belong to a faith and parties which have failed everywhere, where they gained power by force. In India, these Marxist people are in the company of communist parties which were founded in 1925 along with the RSS. The difference between the growth of the Marxist ideology and the communist parties on the one hand and that of the RSS and nationalist organisations like the BJP on the other can be easily seen by every person who has eyes to see, mind to think, ears to hear and honesty to recognise facts. These “eminents” are confined to a few universities and the communist parties are totally insignificant in almost all parts of India excepting in Kerala, West Bengal and Tripura. These are “left” outs.
6. What India now is witnessing is an alliance of Marxists, their executives in the communist parties, Islamists, evangelists and their allied NGOs and secularists “(that is, professional (not natural) Indians but in fact Resident Non-Indians (RNIs). Many of them have infiltrated into the media, especially those which are surreptitiously and cleverly funded by foreign organisations, those that theologically and practically aim at conversion of all humanity to their own faith. Despite 2000 years of evangelism, and fourteen centuries of terroristic conquest for conversion not all human beings have been gained by these Abrahamic religions and Marxism ( an Abrahamic theology in the political and economic area).
7. It is unfortunate that the daily newspaper, Hindu which was founded by patriotic forbears of the present owners has become the mouth -piece for anti-Hindu “ degreed and alienated” Indians.
8. It is well to note that 60% of England’s non-Muslims, non-Hindus, that is Christians no longer adhere to Christianity and their Churches are getting abandoned. The same trend is visible even in the USA. It has always been the belief of the Abrahamic faiths- Christianity, Islam and communism that the poor will inherit the earth. Continuance of poverty is the only guarantee for the spread of these inhuman faiths . There is not a single development scheme of (different) government of India in the last 67 years that is not opposed by Marxists, their foot soldiers (communists) and now, the harvesters for Jesus Christ unfortunates in the Indian society as directed by the Pope at the turn of the last millennium.
9. Finally, a little comparison of Brahmins with the clergy in Christianity and Islam. Christian clergy was never poor. The Papal Christianity and its clergy owned huge esttes, levied taxes, sold talismans and admissions invented engines of oppression like ex-Communication. Inquisition, burning at the stake, slavery ( the black African people were hunted and taken as slaves to America and inflicted with untouchability and perpetual poverty till recently). In fact, the Christian clergy exercised state power until the Reformation swept Europe a few centuries ago. The white Christian colonist settlers practised untouchability and deprivation of the natives and ghettoing them in South Africa till 1994. The untouchably and ghettoisation of the Afro –Americans even after their conversion to Christianity continued until the middle of the last century and is still in vogue to some extent in America. Waqfs in India are properties of defeated Hindu Kings and soldiers confiscated by the victors, Islamic hordes from abroad. While the lands gifted (Inams) to Brahmins by Hindu Kings had been taken over by governments and distributed to the poor, the loot ( that WAQF is) is still used for the welfare of the progeny of the looter-conquerors and their converted natives.
10. In contrast the Brahmins in India were sworn to poverty. The only wealth that was allowed to them was scholarship and counselling the rulers and people for dharmic government and conduct. Over time, especially during centuries of invasions and loot by alien Islamists followed by European Christian colonist rulers, Hinduism lost its vitality to get rid of the vices that creep into any society with the passage of time. It is only in Hinduism that protesters are not subjected to inquisition, burning at the stake, ex-communication and beheading for blasphemy.
11. This is in contrast to strict injunctions by religious authorities in the Abrahamic faiths of Islam and Christianity and the Abrahamic Marxist faith of communism, not to tolerate kafirs, non-believers and non-party men .
12. Brahmins in India are no longer oppressors; neither are they the exclusively educated persons. In fact, while the lands; gifted to them had been taken over by the state, lands plundered by the conquering Islamic invaders from the defeated Hindus are still preserved as wakfs for the exclusive benefit and welfare of Muslims .
13. Christian Churches are the largest holders of urban properties in India, gifts bestowed by the Christian British rulers of India.
14. Sri Kancha Ilaiah is engaged in a ( one-sided) war to “annihilate” Hinduism and so is in the comfortable and adulatory company of anti-Hindu forces an d funders who promote his hyperbolic eminence.
15. Arthur Koestler, an eminent former Marxist Communist wrote, “the final, final war will be between Communists and ex-Communists”. It could as well be between Hindus and ex-Hindus. (1,373 words)
END